• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Psychology Spot

All About Psychology

  • About
  • Psychology Topics
Home » Ad Hominem Fallacy: Denigrating when arguments are lacking

Ad Hominem Fallacy: Denigrating when arguments are lacking

ad hominem fallacy

“Great minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, small minds discuss people”, said Eleanor Roosevelt. And she was not wrong. When it lacks intellectual height we fall into personal mud.

Unfortunately, the tendency to disqualify others, when they do not have solid arguments, is increasingly common in all spheres of our social life. A tendency that endangers our ability to reach an understanding because it destroys bridges on its path. That tendency is known as the ad hominem fallacy.

What is the ad hominem fallacy?

We witness practically every day the ad hominem fallacy. We can see it in the media or social networks, when there are two parties that defend contrary arguments and one of them tries to discredit the other by resorting to irrelevant arguments for the issue such as the personal appearance, gender, sexual orientation, nationality, cultura, religión or political choice.

The ad hominem fallacy is the tendency to attack the interlocutor, instead of refuting his ideas. Whoever uses it, disqualifies the arguments of the other through personal attacks aimed at undermining their authority or reliability.

We can resort to personal insults, public humiliation, or even bring up mistakes that person made in the past. It is also common to attack the interlocutor’s personal characteristics which, apparently, are in contradiction with the position defended. And there are also those who resort to lies or exaggerate supposed defects of the other to devalue his ideas.

The main objective of this fallacy is to discredit the person who defends an idea by switching the focus of attention to an irrelevant aspect that has nothing or little to do with the question.

Many examples of ad hominem fallacies have occurred and continue to occur throughout history. Arthur Schopenhauer, for example, was a misogynist, but that doesn’t mean that many of his philosophical ideas weren’t extremely interesting. Ayn Rand was a staunch defender of capitalism, but that doesn’t imply that we can’t find value in her objectivism.

As the politician García Damborenea pointed out: “It is understandable that the idea may displease, but if Hitler affirmed that two plus two equals four, we should give him reason.” After all, even a stopped clock tells the truth twice a day. If we do not accept that reality, we simply close ourselves to the diversity and complexity that exists in the world. And we will probably miss out on the opportunity to grow, getting caught up in the ideas of those who think like us and share our value system.

Personal disqualifications say more about the attacker than the attacked

The ad hominem fallacy is often the result of lack of argument and frustration. Using this strategy is like when a footballer fails to reach the ball and trips his opponent to fall. It is not a fair game. And, without a doubt, it says much more about the person who attacks than about who is attacked.

When we don’t have solid ideas, we resort to disqualification and humiliation. These attacks can be extremely virulent and personal as they aim to make the other person feel ashamed and remain silent or lose his credibility with the others.

However, personal attacks also disqualify the attacker, since they show his irrationality and his argumentative poverty. Whoever cannot fight on the plane of ideas, but wants to win at all costs, will drag his interlocutor to the personal plane.

We are very vulnerable to ad hominem arguments

The main problem is that while we like to think of ourselves as highly rational and sensible people, we are actually vulnerable to the ad hominem fallacy, as found by Montana State University researchers.

These researchers asked a number of people to read scientific statements and indicate their attitudes towards them. In some statements was added a direct attack on the empirical basis of the scientific claim, in others was inserted an ad hominem attack on the scientist who made the claim.

The researchers found that ad hominem attacks have the same impact on our opinions as attacks based on logical and scientific arguments. That means we are not objective evaluating the arguments.

In part, this tendency is due to the fact that the credibility and shared values ​​of the issuer are characteristics that we consider positive and determine the influence that a message will have on us. If someone attacks the source of the information on his credibility or judges his values ​, it will sow the seeds of doubt and it is likely that we will give less importance and credibility to his ideas and opinions.

When is provoked an attitude of rejection towards the opponent, we also develop a certain rejection towards his words. It is a psychological phenomenon of transfert that is exacerbated by our tendency to view discussions or debates as competitions in which there must be a winner. And in our society, for winning is not always necessary to be right, but to prevail, even with disqualifications.

How to escape the ad hominem fallacy?

If we are ever in the middle of a debate and we are tempted to attack our interlocutor personally, it’s better we stop for a second to think about what emotion is pushing us to do so. It’s likely anger or frustration. Instead, we must think that a constructive debate is not one in which are declared winners and losers, but one in which both grow.

Being a victim of these types of attacks can also be very frustrating. Therefore, the first thing is to contain the impulse to fight back and take the conflict to the personal level. Jorge Luis Borges told an anecdote in “History of eternity” in which a man was thrown a glass of wine in his face in the middle of an argument. The victim, however, did not flinch. He simply said to the offender: “This, sir, is a digression; I still await your argument”.

We must also protect ourselves from this type of deceptive “argument” that is intended to manipulate the opinion of the masses so that they do not listen to valuable ideas. Therefore, it is a question of keeping an open mind and be alert to any personal attack, because it probably implies that behind there is a solid opinion or idea that is difficult to dismantle.

Sources:

Barnes, R. M. et. Al. (2018) The effect of ad hominem attacks on the evaluation of claims promoted by scientists. PLoS One; 13(1): e0192025.

Dahlman, C. et. Al. (2011) Fallacies in Ad Hominem Arguments. Cogency; 3(2): 105-124.

García Damborenea, R. (2005) Falacia ad hominem, o falacia ad personam. Diccionario de Falacias; 46-52.

Jennifer Delgado

I am a psychologist and I spent several years writing articles for scientific journals specialized in Health and Psychology. I want to help you create great experiences. Learn more about me.

brainstorming

Brainstorming: How to apply this technique to be more creative?

24/02/2021 By Jennifer Delgado

resistence to change causes

10 causes of resistance to change that paralyze you

22/02/2021 By Jennifer Delgado

self-affirmation

Positive Self-Affirmation, the way to be yourself without hurting the others

21/02/2021 By Jennifer Delgado

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Brainstorming: How to apply this technique to be more creative?
  • 10 causes of resistance to change that paralyze you
  • Positive Self-Affirmation, the way to be yourself without hurting the others
  • Wu Wei: Learning to flow with life
  • Being intransigent, the cost of a closed mind

What I’m reading…

DON’T MISS THE LATEST POSTS

Footer

Keep Reading

  • Hugs and happiness
  • Movies about anxiety
  • Psychological movies
  • Free spirit
  • Talking too much
  • Vagus nerve and anxiety
  • Expectations

About

Blog of Psychology, curiosities, research and articles about personal growth and to understand how our mind works.

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 · Digital Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.Accept Reject Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

SAVE & ACCEPT